What’s the old saying, “There’s nothing new under the
sun,”? That was the feeling I was given
while reading Ready Player One.
Much like Suzanne Collins’ Hunger Games, Ready Player One is a
book with a lot of buzz (ok, to be fair, no where near as much buzz as Hunger
Games, but still a lot in book selling circles) that is supposed to be
fresh and original. Although some
aspects of the story were new and inventive, such as a rich compute designer
creating a game to win his inheritance, the idea of a bunch of kids running
through a virtual world laced with pop cultural references just isn’t. The whole time I was reading I couldn’t help
but compare Ready Player One to Tad Williams’ Otherworld
series. Otherworld was also about
a bunch of kids running through a virtual world laced with pop cultural
references, but it was better written and more compelling. This comparison took a lot of the stuffing
out of my enjoyment of the new book.
That’s not
to say I didn’t enjoy the book at all.
I’m a pop culture geek, so anything that is able to reference and center
a plot on stuff from my childhood is going to hold some level of enjoyment for
me. Ready Player One is a fun and
easy read. And maybe that’s why I found Otherworld
more compelling; the stakes in Otherworld are much higher. Otherworld is a darker more serious
story while Ready Player One has the feel of a romp through my favorite
80’s and 90’s pop culture. While both
books require their main characters to have some understanding of pop culture, Otherworld’s
understanding means life and death while Ready Player One’s just means
you win a game. If lighter fare is more
your style, then maybe you would enjoy Ready Player One more then me,
but if you’re big into science fiction and like a little more weight to your
reading, skip Ready Player One and try out Otherworld instead.
No comments:
Post a Comment